Alternatives to a "Palestinian" country in Judea & Samaria.

We hear quite a lot in the mainstream media about a 'two state solution,' a 'peace process,' and a "Palestinian" state living side by side, in peace, with Israel. It seems to me that most people buy into these things - and heck, why not - all Israel has to do is to give the "Palestinian" Arabs what they want, which is a state on the 1948/9 ceasefire lines, with all 'illegal' Jewish 'settlers' removed, the so called settlements destroyed, and for Israel to divide Jerusalem and give "Palestinians" the Eastern half of it for them to have as the capital of their country, as well as for Israel to remove the 'siege' from Gaza, and make room for a corridor in Israel that would join the West Bank to Gaza. Some also state that Israel must allow the "Palestinian" "refugees" to return to their homes that they were brutally expelled from by Jews in Israel's war of independence in 1948-9. These are the views of most in the West, and public opinion polls prove this. But what if Israel is right. What if, if Israel gave "Palestinians" exactly the above, what if there was no peace? How likely is this? According to people in the west, not likely. People would sooner focus on the emotional side of the conflict, because that is easy to do - it requires no thought. You don't have to use your head. I am going to explain what will happen if Israel gave the "Palestinians" what they want - and the consequences this would have on the west. You will most likely discard my views as "propaganda" or "right-wing rubbish" but that still won't change the fact that what you are about to read will, in fact, is, happening already. You just have to open your eyes and connect the dots.I am going to propose an audacious, but not new, solution to this conflict.

So, already we have established that most people in the west are favourable to the "Palestinian" cause. They don't like Israel. They don't like the settlements. And all the Israelis have to do is vacate this or that bit of land and everything will be OK. People keep saying the "Palestinians" are a stateless people and that they deserve their own country, free from Israeli occupation. But is this so? The answer to that question is NO. "Palestinians" are not a stateless people - far from it. Here's why. The very idea of a "Palestinian" Arab people is a fraud from start to finish ; their invention, for political purposes by Egyptian jihadi Yaseer Arafat, sought to change the balance of power in the eyes of the people - namely westerners. Prior to their invention they were known as Arabs, because that's what "Palestinians" are; and these Arabs did not have the support of the westerners. It was huge Arab majority countries versus one tiny Jewish country. Since their invention, the whole conflict has turned into David vs Goliath. Goliath being the "Palestinians" being stateless refugees, with no hope, prospects or future; a people being occupied by another people who just a few short years ago were being gassed in Europe, this other people backed by the most powerful country in the world, The United States of America.
There are other tell-tale signs of "Palestinian" Arabs being an invention. The most obvious, is the fact that there isn't even a letter 'p' in the Arabic alphabet - "Palestinian" Arabs cannot pronounce the name of their so called country, and their so called identity! I can't think of any other people in the world who are unable to pronounce their country or identity in their own language! But of course, we are not meant to think of that - we are just supposed to judge this on emotions only!
So in reality, "Palestinians" are Arabs, and Arabs have countries stretching halfway across the planet.There is no difference between a "Palestinian" Arab, and an Arab that resides in Egypt, Syria, Algeria or Saudi Arabia. They all culturally the same.

Now that we've established the "Palestinians" are an invented people, with numerous Arab countries already existing, we can begin to look at the fraud of their refugee status. The "Palestinian" "refugee" crisis was created through Israel's war of independence which was fought between 1948 and 1949. After the war, a United Nations agency was set up specifically designed to deal with the refugee situation. Bear in mind that no other group of refugees has ever had their own agency - just the "Palestinians." There are two UN refugee agencies. The first being the one solely for "Palestinians" called UNWRA, and the second, for all other refugees in the world, UNHCR.
UNWRA was originally established with a two year mandate, meaning that by 1950/51, the Arab refugee situation should have been resolved. Over half a century later, it still exists. There are many contributing factors for this; some are:

• Arab insistence on the 'right of return' 
• Arab refusal to integrate their fellow Arabs into the vast expanses of Arab land that already exist
• Arab world using the "Palestinians" are a permanent weapon of war against Israel
• Western funding of UNWRA. 

We also need to look at the definition of refugee. According to the UN you are a refugee in UNHCR if you flee your country due to numerous factors, but are only a refugee until you have been resettled and integrated into another country. According to the UN you are a refugee in UNWRA if you are a "Palestinian" who fled their homes during Israel's war of independence, and were a resident of British Palestine for only TWO years. There were about 750,000 refugees at the time. In the St century, now in 2014, the UN estimates that there are nearly 5,000000 "Palestinian" refugees. How could this be? The answer is simple. UNWRA allows a "Palestinian" refugee to transfer their refugee status from generation to generation EVEN IF THEY ARE RESETTLED IN ANOTHER ARAB COUNTRY, i.e.. Jordan. So all the "Palestinian" citizens of Jordan who are successfully integrated into the country are still considered a refugee by the UN, and by the looks of things, the world. The Arab world wants these 'refugees' to return to Israel, making Israel non-Jewish, Arab, and Muslim majority. This charade has been allowed to continue by the west as we continue to give UNWRA money! 

What is even more startling, is the fact that the "Palestinian" "refugees" have been given more money to resettle themselves, than the whole of Europe did after WW2! The only refugee crisis that has not been resolved pre 1950 is the Arab one! 

Ban the Burka.

In today's politically correct world, if you criticize the religion of peace  you're likely to be deemed Islamophobic. If you stand up for democracy you're a racist, and if you stand up for free speech you're a fascist.  If you are one of the people who thinks like this, stop reading this post as its going to highly Islamophobic, racist & fascist; - the very last thing I want to do is cause offense and harm community relations.

This morning I was waiting for a bus when I saw a Muslim woman, man & their two kids walk past me. The woman was dressed from head to toe in a black rag, known as the Burka. The Dad was dressed in a white robe, and I was unfortunately unable to catch a glimpse of what the kids were wearing.  This was the first time I'd ever personally seen a Muslim woman dressed in a dehumanizing cloak. For a moment I thought I was in London. In reality however I was in a small-ish town in the south of England - who's population is comprised of mainly OAP's who come to town to die. Never did I think the day would come where I witnessed a Muslim dressed in a full Burka in my own hometown. Unfortunately this kind of occurrence is likely to become ever more regular as Islam is allowed to eat into our society.

There are many good reasons to ban the Burka England.

The most obvious reason is security. Bank robbers go round in Balaclavas, which is very similar to the Burka, it looks ugly and conceals identity. In public you should be legally obliged to show your face - including Muslim women who insist on wearing these cloaks of death - however damaging this may be to community cohesion or their self esteem. The Burka should be banned in cafe's,shops,banks and anywhere else an infidel (non-Muslim)  is expected to show their face as a matter of course.

It's the twenty-first century, not the sixth. The Burka is something straight out of a primitive mindset and culture which deserves as much respect as Tony Blair. There is nothing in the Koran that instructs a woman to go round in public in disguise. The Koran tells Muslims to dress modestly - wearing these mobile tents is not 'modest' but insane and dehumanizing and should be ridiculed out of existence -  and any Muslim woman who insists on wearing one of these things should consider seeing a doctor.

Islam will destroy our culture from within if we are not careful - it's already visibly underway in certain European countries so banning these ridiculous outfits will go at least a small way to making sure the religion of peace doesn't destroy us from within. It will be a small step in defeating Sharia Law - the Islamic legal code. Muslims who insist on dressing up like Darth Vader in public should consider going to live in the Islamic world. Muslims who choose to live in the free world should abide by our rules and our way of life and not force their primitive culture and religion into the lives of everyone around them.

The cloak of death is also far more than just a face covering - its a political statement and a powerful symbol of just how some Muslim women are treated in the Islamic world. Some women in the Muslim world (and here in England) will have no choice but to wear the Burka and if they don't, they could be beaten by their husband. Islam hates women & according to Islam - women are possessions, who's value in life is worth only half of a mans - and women are regularly discriminated against in the birth place and holiest country of Islam - Saudi Arabia.

Anyone who legitimizes this usage of this disgusting cloak, including you George 'Meow' Galloway, should be ashamed of themselves. Its the 21st century and its about time certain Muslims - and Islam in general moved into this century. It's about time politicians and the the media dropped this PC crap and caused some offense! It's about time the Burka was banned from being worn in public in the free world, and any Muslim immigrant who insists on wearing one, be deported without delay to where ever they came from - and if they are born in the free world -fined and forced to remove the Burka.